Photo Courtesy of: science.howstuffworks.com |
We live in a world that has become very attentive and mindful of what words we use to describe people, especially when we describe children or adults with special needs. For example, we don't say "autistic child" we say "child with autism". We say "challenged" and "differently abled". These words and phrases are an effort to not place a permanent label and therefore not put a limit the individual's abilities.
While our efforts to use more respectful, person centered speech is admirable, there are times when we would all just say it as it is as I do think there are occasions when a label can be very helpful for both the labeler and the labeled.
Some of you will object to this idea of labeling, especially since society has worked so hard to remove certain words from our vocabulary, and considering my work as a special needs yoga educator & as an advocate of adapting activities for the purpose of inclusion of all children of all abilities. However, hear me out as you consider this: If it were not for the labels, I would not know how to approach and communicate and engage the children so that I can help them. I would not be able to adapt or customize programs so that all of children can participate. Children cannot learn unless we know their 'label' and therefore how to teach them.
If I don't know that a child has the label of "dyspraxia", I don't know how to break down yoga sequences or even the individual poses into smaller more manageable movements so that the child can build motor memory or planning; If I don't have the label of "non-verbal" then I don't know to use an alternative form of communication with that child.
The truth is, we label each other all the time. How many times have you referred to your boss as "type A" or your coworker as "neurotic" or your neighbor as "friendly", that woman flirting with your husband as "trashy" and the girl behind the grocery checkout as "rude" ? These labels give us a clue into how we will approach-or avoid-a person or situation. We also label ourselves, sometimes positively, and sometimes not.
While every person is truly unique and no amount of labeling will ever be able to categorize all human beings, we need not be afraid of labels, nor do we need to eliminate them from our vocabulary all together, especially in education. In entirely removing them, we are doing these children a disservice by limiting our own ability to communicate the nature of the learner's difficulties & deficiencies more efficiently and to find better ways to approach & strategies to ultimately help them.
I came across an article written by Gavin Bollard (Life With Asperger's Blog) discussing Temple Grandin's three types of Thinkers in Autism . I think Gavin makes an excellent point that if we know how a person thinks, then we can find the most effective methods to help that individual to learn.
I would like to see us all become more careful and responsible of how & when we use labels and of how we use and interpret the information contained on the label. We need to use that information to help-not hinder nor harm each other. A label should never be used as a crutch or an excuse to not try our best. We also need to keep in mind (and remind the kids) that the label does not define an individual- it is only a small part of who they are and a part of the journey to becoming who they are going to be.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We welcome your comments!